<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 2.0 isn&#8217;t made up of domainers</title>
	<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/web-20-isnt-made-up-of-domainers.htm</link>
	<description>Internet publishing, a multidisciplinary approach.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Publishing. Sports. Humor. Personal. Web 2.0 Forum. Libraries.</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/web-20-isnt-made-up-of-domainers.htm#comment-55951</link>
		<author>Web 2.0 &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Publishing. Sports. Humor. Personal. Web 2.0 Forum. Libraries.</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/web-20-isnt-made-up-of-domainers.htm#comment-55951</guid>
		<description>[...] Web 2.0 isn&#8217;t made up of domainers. Filed under: Web Publishing, Domains Andrew @ 4:01 pm &#8230; me time after time is the domain names Web 2.0 startups use. &#8230; Click Here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Web 2.0 isn&#8217;t made up of domainers. Filed under: Web Publishing, Domains Andrew @ 4:01 pm &#8230; me time after time is the domain names Web 2.0 startups use. &#8230; Click Here [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Pingback by Domainers &#8221; Blog Archive &#8221; Web</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/web-20-isnt-made-up-of-domainers.htm#comment-15612</link>
		<author>Web 2.0 &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Pingback by Domainers &#8221; Blog Archive &#8221; Web</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/web-20-isnt-made-up-of-domainers.htm#comment-15612</guid>
		<description>[...] Pingback by Domainers &#8221; Blog Archive &#8221; Web 2.0 isn&#8217;t made up of domainers &#8230; Law; Forums; Online Communities; Online Gambling Click Here Archived in Fun &#8230; Continue [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Pingback by Domainers &#8221; Blog Archive &#8221; Web 2.0 isn&#8217;t made up of domainers &#8230; Law; Forums; Online Communities; Online Gambling Click Here Archived in Fun &#8230; Continue [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 &#187; Blog Archives &#187; casino web pages gambling</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/web-20-isnt-made-up-of-domainers.htm#comment-15583</link>
		<author>Web 2.0 &#187; Blog Archives &#187; casino web pages gambling</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 05:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/web-20-isnt-made-up-of-domainers.htm#comment-15583</guid>
		<description>[...] Online Gambling Click Here Archived in Fun &#124; Trackback &#124; del.icio.us &#124; Top OfPage [ ] Pingback by Web 2.0 Blog Archives Web2.0Slides &#124; Web 2.0 Slideshow October 2, 2006 @ 5:23 am Read This [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Online Gambling Click Here Archived in Fun | Trackback | del.icio.us | Top OfPage [ ] Pingback by Web 2.0 Blog Archives Web2.0Slides | Web 2.0 Slideshow October 2, 2006 @ 5:23 am Read This [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Web2.0Slides &#124; Web 2.0 Slideshow</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/web-20-isnt-made-up-of-domainers.htm#comment-4194</link>
		<author>Web 2.0 &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Web2.0Slides &#124; Web 2.0 Slideshow</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/web-20-isnt-made-up-of-domainers.htm#comment-4194</guid>
		<description>[...] Google; Law; Forums; Online Communities; Online Gambling Click Here   Archived in Fun &#124; Trackback &#124; del.icio.us &#124; Top OfPage [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Google; Law; Forums; Online Communities; Online Gambling Click Here   Archived in Fun | Trackback | del.icio.us | Top OfPage [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/web-20-isnt-made-up-of-domainers.htm#comment-3823</link>
		<author>James Stewart</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/web-20-isnt-made-up-of-domainers.htm#comment-3823</guid>
		<description>How about goobang.com ???
hehe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about goobang.com ???<br />
hehe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domainers &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web 2.0 isn&#8217;t made up of domainers</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/web-20-isnt-made-up-of-domainers.htm#comment-3273</link>
		<author>Domainers &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web 2.0 isn&#8217;t made up of domainers</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/web-20-isnt-made-up-of-domainers.htm#comment-3273</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Andrew and software by Elliott Back [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Original post by Andrew and software by Elliott Back [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/web-20-isnt-made-up-of-domainers.htm#comment-3228</link>
		<author>Marc</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/web-20-isnt-made-up-of-domainers.htm#comment-3228</guid>
		<description>I agree Andrew. The Web 2.0 crowd is lost in space when it comes to names. For most of those names to be viable, you need some major brand recognition. Not likely, since most of these are offering services that will never become mainstream or even useful in my opinion. The problem with Web 2.0ers is that they are more interested in being clever than making money. It's nice if you can do both at the same time, but most of these guys just aren't clever enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Andrew. The Web 2.0 crowd is lost in space when it comes to names. For most of those names to be viable, you need some major brand recognition. Not likely, since most of these are offering services that will never become mainstream or even useful in my opinion. The problem with Web 2.0ers is that they are more interested in being clever than making money. It&#8217;s nice if you can do both at the same time, but most of these guys just aren&#8217;t clever enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
