<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The myth of non-converting Adsense traffic</title>
	<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/the-myth-of-non-converting-adsense-traffic.htm</link>
	<description>Internet publishing, a multidisciplinary approach.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 08:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: chromate</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/the-myth-of-non-converting-adsense-traffic.htm#comment-3545</link>
		<author>chromate</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/the-myth-of-non-converting-adsense-traffic.htm#comment-3545</guid>
		<description>AdSense isn't a scam. It just doesn't work well for all advertisers - and they should manage their campaigns to test for that.

I have to say though, that most of the time I do have the content network turned off. I've found that conversions from content ads are terrible most of the time compared to search. Maybe it's the copy I use for the ads or something that works better with search. 

Actually, it would be good to do a case study on the whole content vs search ads thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AdSense isn&#8217;t a scam. It just doesn&#8217;t work well for all advertisers - and they should manage their campaigns to test for that.</p>
<p>I have to say though, that most of the time I do have the content network turned off. I&#8217;ve found that conversions from content ads are terrible most of the time compared to search. Maybe it&#8217;s the copy I use for the ads or something that works better with search. </p>
<p>Actually, it would be good to do a case study on the whole content vs search ads thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
