<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reported Domains Sales of 2005 over $10,000 totalled $25.9 million</title>
	<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/reported-domains-sales-of-2005-over-10000-totalled-259-million.htm</link>
	<description>Internet publishing, a multidisciplinary approach.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/reported-domains-sales-of-2005-over-10000-totalled-259-million.htm#comment-477</link>
		<author>Andrew</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/reported-domains-sales-of-2005-over-10000-totalled-259-million.htm#comment-477</guid>
		<description>Thats pretty much it. None of the domains above qualify as "bad" domains, in fact, even the $10,000 ones are pretty damn good. When you start looking at amateur speculators portfolios and sub-$1000 domain sales there is tons of garbage -- and great examples of what not to register/buy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats pretty much it. None of the domains above qualify as &#8220;bad&#8221; domains, in fact, even the $10,000 ones are pretty damn good. When you start looking at amateur speculators portfolios and sub-$1000 domain sales there is tons of garbage &#8212; and great examples of what not to register/buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deron</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/reported-domains-sales-of-2005-over-10000-totalled-259-million.htm#comment-476</link>
		<author>Deron</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/reported-domains-sales-of-2005-over-10000-totalled-259-million.htm#comment-476</guid>
		<description>I assume the pattern is that the smaller/single word domains are golden, and others can still have value just not nearly as high?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume the pattern is that the smaller/single word domains are golden, and others can still have value just not nearly as high?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
