<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Make your new site look like an authority</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpublishingblog.com/make-your-new-site-look-like-an-authority.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/make-your-new-site-look-like-an-authority.htm</link>
	<description>Internet publishing, a multidisciplinary approach.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:31:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sana</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/make-your-new-site-look-like-an-authority.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2761</link>
		<dc:creator>sana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpublishingblog.com/make-your-new-site-look-like-an-authority.htm#comment-2761</guid>
		<description>vvvvvvvvvvery funny uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu   rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr  22222222222222222222222222222 much disgusting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vvvvvvvvvvery funny uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu   rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr  22222222222222222222222222222 much disgusting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/make-your-new-site-look-like-an-authority.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2589</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 20:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpublishingblog.com/make-your-new-site-look-like-an-authority.htm#comment-2589</guid>
		<description>Nice! I needed this info, as I usually fail big time doing this :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice! I needed this info, as I usually fail big time doing this :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/make-your-new-site-look-like-an-authority.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2554</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpublishingblog.com/make-your-new-site-look-like-an-authority.htm#comment-2554</guid>
		<description>There certainly are people who just make things up, but I think there is any need to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There certainly are people who just make things up, but I think there is any need to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Beasley</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/make-your-new-site-look-like-an-authority.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2545</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Beasley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 03:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpublishingblog.com/make-your-new-site-look-like-an-authority.htm#comment-2545</guid>
		<description>What about faking your history. I was just on an industry site just now and noticed their copyright statement read 1996-2006. I thought this was odd because I know that they have only been doing this a couple years, I&#039;ve seen them post as much in forums. So I checked the whois history and sure enough, domain record first created in 2004. 

It makes them look silly if you do the research, but on first glance those extra 8 years make them seem more credible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about faking your history. I was just on an industry site just now and noticed their copyright statement read 1996-2006. I thought this was odd because I know that they have only been doing this a couple years, I&#8217;ve seen them post as much in forums. So I checked the whois history and sure enough, domain record first created in 2004. </p>
<p>It makes them look silly if you do the research, but on first glance those extra 8 years make them seem more credible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
