<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If I&#8217;m number 1 in Google for &#8220;some keyphrase&#8221;, how much traffic will I get?</title>
	<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/im-number-3-in-google-for-some-keyphrase-how-much-traffic-will-i-get.htm</link>
	<description>Internet publishing, a multidisciplinary approach.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/im-number-3-in-google-for-some-keyphrase-how-much-traffic-will-i-get.htm#comment-2990</link>
		<author>Andrew</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/im-number-3-in-google-for-some-keyphrase-how-much-traffic-will-i-get.htm#comment-2990</guid>
		<description>There is room for very wide variations here.

First of all, this is AOL data, not google. AOL's SERP is structured in such a way that there are three sponsored search links plus sometimes images or extra content (stock ticker), all in the fold.

I am not an AOL user and never have been, so I don't know if http://search.aol.com is what all users see. If so, that would be explainable.. which would indeed have an impact on all of this data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is room for very wide variations here.</p>
<p>First of all, this is AOL data, not google. AOL&#8217;s SERP is structured in such a way that there are three sponsored search links plus sometimes images or extra content (stock ticker), all in the fold.</p>
<p>I am not an AOL user and never have been, so I don&#8217;t know if <a href="http://search.aol.com" rel="nofollow">http://search.aol.com</a> is what all users see. If so, that would be explainable.. which would indeed have an impact on all of this data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chromate</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/im-number-3-in-google-for-some-keyphrase-how-much-traffic-will-i-get.htm#comment-2989</link>
		<author>Chromate</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 21:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/im-number-3-in-google-for-some-keyphrase-how-much-traffic-will-i-get.htm#comment-2989</guid>
		<description>Haven't had a chance to read the stuff you link to (pushed for time). But from the percentages you posted, I would question the data. 42% for #1 to 11.9 for #2 ?! No way. Well, at least not in my experience. I've not noticed that much of a jump between #1 to #3 actually. Perhaps at most 10%. Anyway, there seems to be a big drop if you fall below rank #3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t had a chance to read the stuff you link to (pushed for time). But from the percentages you posted, I would question the data. 42% for #1 to 11.9 for #2 ?! No way. Well, at least not in my experience. I&#8217;ve not noticed that much of a jump between #1 to #3 actually. Perhaps at most 10%. Anyway, there seems to be a big drop if you fall below rank #3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
