<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s recent update shakes up rankings again</title>
	<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/googles-recent-update-shakes-up-rankings-again.htm</link>
	<description>Internet publishing, a multidisciplinary approach.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/googles-recent-update-shakes-up-rankings-again.htm#comment-25</link>
		<author>Steven</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/googles-recent-update-shakes-up-rankings-again.htm#comment-25</guid>
		<description>He mentions that the update appears to be Google's attempts to make information sites appear at the top of the SERPS.  While this may be true for the smaller commercial sites, the big players still dominate the top of the SERPS for all their keywods.  In the case of Amazon, most searches for the title of a book will have Amazon as the first or second result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He mentions that the update appears to be Google&#8217;s attempts to make information sites appear at the top of the SERPS.  While this may be true for the smaller commercial sites, the big players still dominate the top of the SERPS for all their keywods.  In the case of Amazon, most searches for the title of a book will have Amazon as the first or second result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
