<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DMOZ is broken, its time for 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpublishingblog.com/dmoz-is-a-broken-its-time-for-20.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/dmoz-is-a-broken-its-time-for-20.htm</link>
	<description>Internet publishing, a multidisciplinary approach.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:43:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMOZ Is A Broken, Its Time For 2.0 - Web [ Ectio.us ]</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/dmoz-is-a-broken-its-time-for-20.htm/comment-page-1#comment-78517</link>
		<dc:creator>DMOZ Is A Broken, Its Time For 2.0 - Web [ Ectio.us ]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpublishingblog.com/dmoz-is-a-broken-its-time-for-20.htm#comment-78517</guid>
		<description>[...] From webpublishingblog.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From webpublishingblog.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/dmoz-is-a-broken-its-time-for-20.htm/comment-page-1#comment-73606</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 06:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpublishingblog.com/dmoz-is-a-broken-its-time-for-20.htm#comment-73606</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been editing at Dmoz  since &#039;99. I didn&#039;t get in to list my site, it was already there. The only thing I know about corruption is that editors caught in shady business are summarily canned. 
.
These invariably spend the next few years proclaiming they have no idea why they&#039;re out (like joost) and (even more fun) running from one forum to another claiming dmoz is corrupt. 
.
As for the big $5000 extortion scam, that was plain old link bait. Nobody on the planet considers a listing worth $5000 even if we charged. &quot;Shoe&quot; knew bloggers would circle the wagons to protect their own, and despite Dmoz staff offering to can the editor if he&#039;ll provide the email, he suddenly doesn&#039;t see a need to have an extortionist brought to justice. Meanwhile page after page on google refers to his website. It worked.
.
The project has a LOT of work to do to catch up to changes on the net, and we&#039;re working on that. AOL just added staff and resources, and hopefully we&#039;ll emerge a better product. 
.
Meanwhile the corruption thing is like the Proctor &amp; Gamble satanist connection... a popular urban legend that will never die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been editing at Dmoz  since &#8217;99. I didn&#8217;t get in to list my site, it was already there. The only thing I know about corruption is that editors caught in shady business are summarily canned.<br />
.<br />
These invariably spend the next few years proclaiming they have no idea why they&#8217;re out (like joost) and (even more fun) running from one forum to another claiming dmoz is corrupt.<br />
.<br />
As for the big $5000 extortion scam, that was plain old link bait. Nobody on the planet considers a listing worth $5000 even if we charged. &#8220;Shoe&#8221; knew bloggers would circle the wagons to protect their own, and despite Dmoz staff offering to can the editor if he&#8217;ll provide the email, he suddenly doesn&#8217;t see a need to have an extortionist brought to justice. Meanwhile page after page on google refers to his website. It worked.<br />
.<br />
The project has a LOT of work to do to catch up to changes on the net, and we&#8217;re working on that. AOL just added staff and resources, and hopefully we&#8217;ll emerge a better product.<br />
.<br />
Meanwhile the corruption thing is like the Proctor &amp; Gamble satanist connection&#8230; a popular urban legend that will never die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/dmoz-is-a-broken-its-time-for-20.htm/comment-page-1#comment-72508</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpublishingblog.com/dmoz-is-a-broken-its-time-for-20.htm#comment-72508</guid>
		<description>I agree with that assumption. Considering how aggressively Google has come out against paid links, DMOZ&#039;s SE weight may already be in the fast lane to worthlessness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with that assumption. Considering how aggressively Google has come out against paid links, DMOZ&#8217;s SE weight may already be in the fast lane to worthlessness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/dmoz-is-a-broken-its-time-for-20.htm/comment-page-1#comment-72356</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpublishingblog.com/dmoz-is-a-broken-its-time-for-20.htm#comment-72356</guid>
		<description>I definately like your transparency idea. But seriously, after the meltdown last October and how long it took to get DMOZ back up, I really wonder if the people behind the scenes over there would be up to the task of making some big changes to their system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definately like your transparency idea. But seriously, after the meltdown last October and how long it took to get DMOZ back up, I really wonder if the people behind the scenes over there would be up to the task of making some big changes to their system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
