Free Web Publishing Trends & News - Your Email:

PPC Advertising


May 15, 2007

Ivanka Trump “meeting” as prize in a Yahoo Search Marketing contest??

Filed under: PPC Advertising — Andrew @ 2:16 pm

I just opened this e-mail today from Yahoo called the “Ultimate Connection Contest.” The prize includes $25,000 of Yahoo Search Marketing credits (pretty cool.) Oddly it also includes “An executive meeting with Ivanka Trump.”

For those of you who haven’t seen The Apprentice here in the states, Ivanka Trump is Donald Trump’s daughter. I looked at her bio on wikipedia and I saw nothing about pay per click marketing. I see things about her being a model, making television appearances, being on The Apprentice with her father, and getting a bacheler of science in economics. Perhaps Yahoo should replace her with someone like Jeremy Shoemaker or Aaron Wall? Just a suggestion.

If you are interested in the $25,000, check out this link.

April 17, 2007

Marketers should check out AOL Search Marketplace (when its public)

Filed under: PPC Advertising — Andrew @ 11:52 pm

I have been really busy since returning from New York, so I have not had a chance to test the new AOL Search Marketplace yet. At Search Engine Strategies Yahoo had a booth and did a drawing for a free Mini Cooper to promote it. I was suprised to have heard nothing of it before this (may be I am living in a shell, but I read quite a few blogs.)

Previously, Adwords ads were syndicated through AOL.com. You really did not have an option whether to target them specifically or exclude them. So whats the big deal here? The deal is, in my experience, AOL has exceptionally strong conversions. In other words, you can now target AOL specifically and make bids based on AOL.com conversion data. Previously you were, in effect, bidding on a “pile” of traffic with AOL included. This may even allow you to drop your Adwords bids to make up for fewer conversions.

AOL Search Marketplace uses Google Adwords technology behind it. Officially, its a Adwords white labelled solution. This means you won’t be using a buggy and/or crippled piece of garbage like MSN and Yahoo have been in the past.

Add this to your list of high quality PPC traffic sources: Google, Yahoo, MSN, and now AOL. On the downside, it does not appear to be publicly available yet. They probably want to give eBay and Amazon a chance before getting bombarded by ringtone affiliates.

February 23, 2007

Adwords Quality score still a brain twisting mess

Filed under: PPC Advertising — Andrew @ 2:08 am

Another short post — Graywolf has wants to know why his blog has a poorer quality score for his own name than Matt Cutts, Dave Pasternack, Jason Calacanis, and Ted Leonsis. In his own words “So basically what’s happening is because I have a more common name than any of the people above, and there are other more “famous” Michael Gray’s I’m less important, relatively speaking, and forced to pay more for a keyword I that more accurately describes me than one which doesn’t.

Graywolf isn’t the only one closely watching the Adwords quality score, so are the guys over at pepperjam.

Lets face it, SEO has a growing rival cousin — PPCO. This is hardly new either, do a search for “pay per click optimization” in Google and you should see at least 7 relevant advertisers. The difference is in the past it was all about return-on-investment and bid placement management. Increasingly, quality score optimization is going to take center stage.

The glass isn’t half empty — this is good news for obsessive online promoters and affiliate marketers. The barrier to entry is being raised and the money will soon follow.

January 31, 2007

Is “Quality Score” a creative approach to Shill Bidding?

Filed under: PPC Advertising, Web Publishing — Andrew @ 11:50 pm

Adwords advertisers have been had two reactions to Google’s quality score — beat it, run for the hills, or crank up the spending.

With Google’s announcement today of profits nearly tripling over the past year, raking in $1.03 billion in the last quarter alone, cynical ad buyers have to be wondering if the playing field is being artificially skewed solely to boost short term profits.

A technique regularly used on eBay, in auction houses, at car auctions, and so on, is shill bidding. Shill bidding occurs when someone with an interest in the sale bids simply to inflate the price. Crowd psychology makes this technique quite effective.

Wouldn’t it be nice if Google and Yahoo could use shill bidding to hyper-inflate their profits? The problem is its illegal. However, with a completely opaque bid system, why not?

The answer — why break the law when you don’t have to? While Google’s quality score has a noble purpose, the lack of straightforwardness leaves me wondering. Would they improve their user experience if it killed their revenue and margins?

Yahoo is about to jump on board too. On February 5th Yahoo is rolling out its new ranking system which factors in “bid amount and ad quality.” Despite a 61% profit crash, you might want to consider buying their stock.