<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Web Publishing Blog &#187; Offline advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpublishingblog.com/category/offline-advertising/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com</link>
	<description>Internet publishing, a multidisciplinary approach.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:17:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How overvalued is offline advertising?</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/how-overvalued-is-offline-advertising.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/how-overvalued-is-offline-advertising.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 21:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Offline advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpublishingblog.com/?p=632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost exactly a year ago (May 18th, 2008) I wrote a blog post declaring Google wanted to be the king of advertising. That dream received a blow in January when Google announced they were discontinuing their print advertising program. A short time later, in February, Google relegated their radio advertising program to the same fate. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.webpublishingblog.com%2Fhow-overvalued-is-offline-advertising.htm"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.webpublishingblog.com%2Fhow-overvalued-is-offline-advertising.htm&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Almost exactly a year ago (May 18th, 2008) I wrote a blog post declaring <a href="http://www.webpublishingblog.com/google-wants-to-be-the-king-of-ads.htm">Google wanted to be the king of advertising</a>.</p>
<p>That dream received a blow in January when Google announced they were <a href="http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=138561">discontinuing</a> their print advertising program. A short time later, in February, Google relegated their radio advertising program <a href="http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=140691">to the same fate</a>.</p>
<p>I think these stories say more about the state of print and radio than they do about Google&#8217;s failure to expand past online search and display advertising. Rather than investing time and capital in to sinking ships Google decided to cut their losses.</p>
<p>Wonder how bad things could get? <a href="http://www.brianmcdaniel.org/2009/04/06/will-online-ad-revenue-beat-newspapers-in-2011/">Brian McDaniel</a> wrote an interesting blog post comparing the newspaper industries print advertising revenues verse their online advertising revenues. Take a look at his revenue convergence prediction charts. Ouch.</p>
<p>How about radio? Pandora (and probably Last.fm), not satellite radio, <a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=radio+stations%2C+pandora%2C+last.fm&#038;ctab=0&#038;geo=all&#038;date=all&#038;sort=0">will deliver the final death blow</a>.</p>
<p>People don&#8217;t like to accept a future where their values may be diminished. The answers were obvious but newspaper execs preferred to <a href="http://www.seobook.com/why-newspapers-have-lost-their-relevancy">bury their heads in the sand</a>. The same could be said of radio.</p>
<p>Newspapers and radio no longer enjoy a monopoly on attention. As their overinflated advertising revenues vanish, those same dollars may very well not resurface online. As an advertiser, I am very happy I can purchase a slice of the same pie for a lot less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/how-overvalued-is-offline-advertising.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
