<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American bloggers face international risks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpublishingblog.com/american-bloggers-face-international-risks.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/american-bloggers-face-international-risks.htm</link>
	<description>Internet publishing, a multidisciplinary approach.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 08:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Counter to &#8220;American Bloggers Face International Risks&#8221; at Run As Never Get, Wander as Never. COMe</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/american-bloggers-face-international-risks.htm/comment-page-1#comment-28198</link>
		<dc:creator>Counter to &#8220;American Bloggers Face International Risks&#8221; at Run As Never Get, Wander as Never. COMe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 03:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpublishingblog.com/american-bloggers-face-international-risks.htm#comment-28198</guid>
		<description>[...] Â» American bloggers face international risks - Web Publishing Blog One of my favorite blogs, Mashable, was just banned in Thailand.Earlier this month the blog owner, Pete Cashmere, made a post about YouTube banning videos making fun of Thailandâ€™s king â€” light stuff compared to what us Americans see of George Bush. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Â» American bloggers face international risks &#8211; Web Publishing Blog One of my favorite blogs, Mashable, was just banned in Thailand.Earlier this month the blog owner, Pete Cashmere, made a post about YouTube banning videos making fun of Thailandâ€™s king â€” light stuff compared to what us Americans see of George Bush. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aoyoyo</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/american-bloggers-face-international-risks.htm/comment-page-1#comment-28194</link>
		<dc:creator>Aoyoyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 03:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpublishingblog.com/american-bloggers-face-international-risks.htm#comment-28194</guid>
		<description>First of all, &quot;light stuff compared to what us Americans see of George Bush.&quot; this sentence is emotional sentence based on you&#039;re an American. It is not just a light stuff for a Thai like me. 

Secondly, Pete will not be arrested by just posting an argument  about YouTube banned in Thailand. I&#039;m one of Thai bloggers who is hurt about those videos on YouTube but does not agree with the government&#039;s action to YouTube and I&#039;m still free outside the jail.

Thirdly, Jufer Olive - the guy who was arrested because of lesse-marjeste had been live in Thailand for 10 years. He must know the laws and the most respectful &quot;Does and Dont&#039;s&quot; rule of thumbs of living in Thailand. How can you, as a government, ignore this guy who does against the laws? Right?

If, for example, I&#039;m arrested in America because I do something against America&#039;s laws. Can I argue that I am from Thailand and I don&#039;t know the laws as such I can&#039;t be wrong???

Finally, everyone has right to speak but the speech should be fair to whom has been criticized. You can just say that because American&#039;s &quot;freespeech&quot; so you can do anything you want to a person who is not American and living outside America. People in different part of the World also have &quot;right&quot; to protect themselves too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, &#8220;light stuff compared to what us Americans see of George Bush.&#8221; this sentence is emotional sentence based on you&#8217;re an American. It is not just a light stuff for a Thai like me. </p>
<p>Secondly, Pete will not be arrested by just posting an argument  about YouTube banned in Thailand. I&#8217;m one of Thai bloggers who is hurt about those videos on YouTube but does not agree with the government&#8217;s action to YouTube and I&#8217;m still free outside the jail.</p>
<p>Thirdly, Jufer Olive &#8211; the guy who was arrested because of lesse-marjeste had been live in Thailand for 10 years. He must know the laws and the most respectful &#8220;Does and Dont&#8217;s&#8221; rule of thumbs of living in Thailand. How can you, as a government, ignore this guy who does against the laws? Right?</p>
<p>If, for example, I&#8217;m arrested in America because I do something against America&#8217;s laws. Can I argue that I am from Thailand and I don&#8217;t know the laws as such I can&#8217;t be wrong???</p>
<p>Finally, everyone has right to speak but the speech should be fair to whom has been criticized. You can just say that because American&#8217;s &#8220;freespeech&#8221; so you can do anything you want to a person who is not American and living outside America. People in different part of the World also have &#8220;right&#8221; to protect themselves too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

