<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 70 - 20 -10</title>
	<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/70-20-10.htm</link>
	<description>Internet publishing, a multidisciplinary approach.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Are you diversified? - Web Publishing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/70-20-10.htm#comment-874</link>
		<author>&#187; Are you diversified? - Web Publishing Blog</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/70-20-10.htm#comment-874</guid>
		<description>[...] Here is the problem with diversification: even though you are working in a related area it isn&#8217;t directly contributing your main business. Last year I got side tracked on other projects that lost money. Worse, I lost time. This happened because I devoted entire months to projects rather than working on them on the site while focusing on the things I really was good at. This is my solution to that problem &#8212; keep your foot in the door, but don&#8217;t go all the way inside. Google uses the 70-20-10 rule (incidently my top searched keyphrase for this blog.) What this means is that Google employees spend 70% of their time on the core business (Adwords, Adsense, Search), 20% on related projects (Froogle, Google Local, etc.) and 10% on new businesses (Google Talk, Google Maps etc.) If my advertising earnings bottomed out tommorow I could still pay my rent, my hosting, and all my other bills. It would be a pain in the ass, but it would be done. If you are risk averse and can&#8217;t bare to leave your current job (I know a lot of web site owners fall into this area) consider this approach. The truth is, you will be safer than a job where you could get a pink slip tommorow. Short of a worldwide economic collapse you&#8217;ll do just fine. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Here is the problem with diversification: even though you are working in a related area it isn&#8217;t directly contributing your main business. Last year I got side tracked on other projects that lost money. Worse, I lost time. This happened because I devoted entire months to projects rather than working on them on the site while focusing on the things I really was good at. This is my solution to that problem &#8212; keep your foot in the door, but don&#8217;t go all the way inside. Google uses the 70-20-10 rule (incidently my top searched keyphrase for this blog.) What this means is that Google employees spend 70% of their time on the core business (Adwords, Adsense, Search), 20% on related projects (Froogle, Google Local, etc.) and 10% on new businesses (Google Talk, Google Maps etc.) If my advertising earnings bottomed out tommorow I could still pay my rent, my hosting, and all my other bills. It would be a pain in the ass, but it would be done. If you are risk averse and can&#8217;t bare to leave your current job (I know a lot of web site owners fall into this area) consider this approach. The truth is, you will be safer than a job where you could get a pink slip tommorow. Short of a worldwide economic collapse you&#8217;ll do just fine. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/70-20-10.htm#comment-150</link>
		<author>Andrew</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/70-20-10.htm#comment-150</guid>
		<description>This is true, my most successful site right now I developed several months ago. Completely unrelated to anything else I've done.

On the other hand, I have a few projects that consumed a full month each, and ended up making me very little. Granted, I learned a lot in the process.

The "good" site I was talking about, I took a very different approach. I spend a week building it as a test. When I saw that the results were good, I went back and worked hard on it and invested money in content and apps for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is true, my most successful site right now I developed several months ago. Completely unrelated to anything else I&#8217;ve done.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I have a few projects that consumed a full month each, and ended up making me very little. Granted, I learned a lot in the process.</p>
<p>The &#8220;good&#8221; site I was talking about, I took a very different approach. I spend a week building it as a test. When I saw that the results were good, I went back and worked hard on it and invested money in content and apps for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/70-20-10.htm#comment-149</link>
		<author>Charles</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webpublishingblog.com/70-20-10.htm#comment-149</guid>
		<description>This propoertion perhaps works well for an established business, but for a developing business the priorities might be different. I would agree that focusing on what you know works is important and it is important not to get sidetraked by new projects - howere for a web publishing business model, the split might be more 50 - 25 - 25. Those new ideas might just be your daily bread after a google algo change!

Hope the turkey was good!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This propoertion perhaps works well for an established business, but for a developing business the priorities might be different. I would agree that focusing on what you know works is important and it is important not to get sidetraked by new projects - howere for a web publishing business model, the split might be more 50 - 25 - 25. Those new ideas might just be your daily bread after a google algo change!</p>
<p>Hope the turkey was good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
